Saturday, 1 February 2025

In Brahma Sutras Sage Sankara takes for granted, and assumes that a world was created: He there mixes dogmatic theology with philosophy.+

Some people claim that in Sage Sankara's philosophy, there is no place for a personal God (Ishvara), because Ishvara is also described as "false". He appears as Ishvara because of the curtain of Maya. However, as described earlier, just as the world is true on the pragmatic level, similarly, Ishvara is also pragmatically true. Just as the world is not absolutely false, Ishvara is also not absolutely false. He is the distributor of the fruits of one's Karma. To make a pragmatic life successful, it is very important to believe in God and worship him. On the pragmatic level, whenever we talk about Atman, we are in fact talking about God. God is the highest knowledge theoretically possible at that level. Devotion (Bhakti) will cancel the effects of bad Karma and will make a person closer to true knowledge by purifying his mind. Slowly, the difference between the worshipper Teachings of Atmananda Krishna Menon:
The knowledge of one object implies the ignorance of all objects other than that particular object. Ignorance of all objects in deep sleep means really the positive knowledge of the Self, which shines as happiness there. Consequently, the ignorance of the ordinary man in deep sleep is really the knowledge [...]
Remember:~
In Brahma Sutra Sage Sankara takes the position that there is another entity outside us, i.e. the wall really exists separately from the mind. This was because Sage Sankara explains in Manduka Upanishad that those who study the Sutras are religious minds, and intellectual children, hence his popular viewpoint to assist them. These people are afraid to go deeper because it means being heroic enough to refuse to accept Sruti, and God's authority, in case they mean punishment by God.
Sage Sankara says: Keep the scriptures for children but throw them on the fire for wise seekers.
In Brahma Sutras Sage Sankara takes for granted, and assumes that a world was created: He there mixes dogmatic theology with philosophy.
That God created the world is an absolute lie; nevertheless, you will find Sage Sankara (in his commentary on Vedanta Sutras) clearly says this! He has to adapt his teachings to his audience, reserving the highest for philosophical minds.
The text of Brahma Sutras is based on religion, and dogmatism, but in the commentary, Sage Sankara cleverly introduced some philosophy. It is objected that several Upanishads are equally dogmatic because they also begin by assuming Brahman, but a few Upanishads do not but prove Brahman at the end of a train of proof.
Remember:~
In Brahma Sutras Sage Sankara takes for granted, and assumes that a world was created: He there mixes dogmatic theology with philosophy.
That God created the world is an absolute lie; nevertheless, you will find Sage Sankara (in his commentary on Vedanta Sutras) clearly says this! He has to adapt his teachings to his audience, reserving the highest for philosophical minds.
The text of Brahma Sutras is based on religion, and dogmatism, but in the commentary, Sage Sankara cleverly introduced some philosophy. It is objected that many Upanishads are equally dogmatic because they also begin by assuming Brahman, but a few Upanishads do not but prove Brahman at the end of a train of proof.
The causality and creation, but are for religious people only. Religion is only for those who are unable to understand the truth beyond form, time, and space.

Religion is not final. It only gives satisfaction to the populace. Self-knowledge is for the whole of humanity to free them from experiencing birth, life, death, and the world as reality.
People of small intelligence follow religion and believe that the world was created by God. But how do they know that He did so? When a pot is created, one can see both the pot and its maker, but not in the case of the world. :~ Santthosh Kumar

If you are seeking truth there is no need to discuss no need to argue, read my blogs and posts and think and reason deeply.+

What is there to discuss argue and exchange opinions? If one is seeking truth there is no need to discuss no need to argue, read think, and reason deeply, then the truth will start revealing itself on its own. Be an independent thinker.

Do not accept anything without verification the seeker should not argue and waste his time. The argument will not yield truth. Only intellectuals argue to exhibit their intellectual wealth.

The intellectual argument is based on ego. The ego-based intellectuality is limited to form, time, and space. The truth you are seeking is based on the Soul.

The Soul is hidden by the illusory form, time, and space. Thus, what is the use of egocentric argument in the soulcentric discussion?

That is why Bhagavan Buddha said: ~ Believe nothing because a wise man said it, Believe nothing because it is generally held. Believe nothing because it is written. Believe nothing because it is said to be divine. Believe nothing because someone else said it. But believe only what you, yourself judge to be true

The wisdom consists in knowing the truth, that everything (mind or physical existence) is consciousness. Freedom (ultimate truth) is always there yet one does not know it. But those whose reason is turned away from physicality and who have attained the serenity of the Soul or consciousness, the Self, are quite near to realizing the ultimate truth or Brahman.

Ashtavakra: ~ Diamonds are not many; only pebbles and rocks are so common. A single diamond is enough.

Intellectuals argue, that if everything is the consciousness, how can one give up anything? Can you give up anything? These types of questions are speculation based on the waking entity (ego), which is the false Self within the false experience.

Without knowing the ‘Self is not the form but the ‘Self’ is formless it is impossible to realize the truth, which is beyond the form, time, and space.

All their speculation is limited to the domain of form, time, and space whereas the truth is beyond form, time, and space. They are incapable of understanding and assimilating truth, which is the ever-formless, timeless, and spaceless existence. They refuse to verify and they want the truth on their own terms. : ~ Santthosh Kumaar

In Self-awareness, whether one has a body with a name whether he lives in the world whether he is action or inaction, it does not make any difference.+

Q:~ Moksha Sangha Just wish to know sir. How do you feel when you end the note with Santthosh Kumaar? Merged in Advaita Self-awareness?

Santthosh Kumaar: ~ In Self-awareness, whether one has a body with a name whether he lives in the world whether he is action or inaction, it does not make any difference.

A Gnani sees reality in the midst of the dualistic illusion. there is no separation of form, time, and space for Gnani even in the midst of separation of form, time, and space.

Advaitic Self-awareness is not yogic samadhis where the yogi sees only blankness. An ignorant thinks there is nothing that exists because of his ignorance.

The look of an object will depend upon the medium through which the observer views it. In fact, our mental and intellectual conditions determine the world, observed and experienced. The commoner viewing the world will see differently from a Gnani viewing the same world. Each one interprets the world that they see in terms of their existing knowledge. The commoner sees everything based on the ego and, therefore, experiences birth, life, death, and the world as a reality, whereas a Gnani sees everything as consciousness and he is fully aware of the fact that, there is no second thing that exists other than the Soul or consciousness even in the midst of the diversity. He sees unity in diversity in the midst of diversity.

Advaitin Sage and Maya:

The King of the Hoysalas was a dualist and was greatly incensed at the doctrine taught by Advaitin Sage that everything here below is an illusion. He wanted to teach the exponent of this doctrine a lesson. So he invited the then Advaitin sage to his palace. That Advaitin sage went there and stoutly maintained that everything in this world was an illusion. The king had arranged to let loose an infuriated elephant against, Advaitin Sage. The beast rushed at Advaitin sage who took to a precipitate flight to save himself.

'Oh, Venerable Sir,' shouted the king, 'why do you run so fast seeing that the elephant is only an illusion?'

'Oh, king,' said Advaitin Sage in the course of his flight, 'my running too is an illusion. Everything in this world is an illusion.

Remember:`

In reality, the Soul and the world in which you exist are one, in essence. Thus, there is no second thing exists other than the Soul, which is present in the form of the consciousness.

Perfect understanding and assimilation of ‘what is what,’ leads to a perfect conviction of ‘What is truth?” and ‘What is the untruth?. Perfect conviction of the truth leads to Advaitic self-awareness.

It takes time for the seeker to gain the perfect understanding of ‘what is truth’ and ‘’what is untruth’. It takes time for the Soul, the Self to wake up from the sleep of ignorance, and it takes time for one to realize the truth, which is beyond form, time, and space.

Self-knowledge is not a question-and-answer session. As the seeker digs into old and new posts, he will gradually start understanding and assimilating the Self-knowledge or Brahma Gnana or Atma Gnana.

It is a waste of time to spend time in discussion. Unless the seeker thinks independently by dropping all the accumulated knowledge it is impossible to acquire Self-knowledge. Holding any Guru or holy man and his teaching as will not be able to get Advaitic Gnana.

The path of wisdom is the Soulcentric path. Thus, egocentric intellectualism has nothing to do with the truth which is beyond form, time, and space. All accumulated dross leads to hallucination.

Katha Upanishad says:~ Fools dwelling in darkness, but thinking themselves wise and erudite, go round and round, by various tortuous paths, like the blind led by the blind. (Ch II-5 P-14)

Jesus said: ~ “Do not throw your pearls before pigs, lest they trample them underfoot and turn to attack you. (Matthew -7:6)

~ Jesus meant knowledge of the Spirit or God or Self-knowledge should not be shared with unqualified people.

The Bhagavad Gita says: ~ Among thousands of men, scarcely one strives for perfection; and of those who strive and succeed, scarcely one knows the ‘Self’ in truth.

Unless the seeker drops all his accumulated knowledge and strives to realize the truth with patience and humility it is not possible to realize the ‘Self’ hidden by the dualistic illusion. In the path of wisdom discussion of the unimportant subject matter, it creates a hindrance.

The path of truth is the path of verification. Nothing has to be accepted as truth without verification. Seeker has to read umpteen times, think deeply, and reflect repeatedly until his reasoning base becomes Soulcentric. Once he becomes he becomes Soulcentric the truth will start revealing on its own. As the seeker digs into old and new posts, he will gradually start understanding and assimilating the Self-knowledge or Brahma Gnana or Atma Gnana.

We have to discard all accumulated knowledge accumulated from different Gurus and their teachings to realize the truth hidden by ignorance.

That is why Sage Sankara says:~ V C:~65. As a treasure hidden underground requires (for its extraction) competent instruction, excavation, the removal of stones and other such things lying above it and (finally) grasping, but never comes out by being (merely) called out by name, so the transparent Truth of the Self, which is hidden by Maya and its effects, is to be attained through the instructions of a knower of Brahman, followed by reflection, meditation and so forth, but not through perverse arguments.

The ultimate truth has to be realized first, and then only it is possible to know what the scriptures are saying. A Gnani does not require any scriptures. : ~Santthosh Kumaar

The waking state is merely an experience, similar to a dream. +

What is that sleep and gets up when the body is not the Self. If the one, which wakes up and dreams and sleeps, is not the body, then how can one say, it is the waking entity’s experience, and the waking entity exists only in waking.

The waking state is merely an experience, similar to a dream. The waking is unreal on the base of the soul or consciousness, which is the Self. Therefore, claiming the authorship as the waking entity and judging the truth on the base of the waking entity, will keep one in ignorance of the reality.
Only if one proves the body or ego is the 'Self', then only the birth, life, death, rebirth, and reincarnation are a reality. If the body or ego is the true self then Advaita has no meaning.
There is no need to inquire, ‘Who am ‘I’?’, ‘What am ‘I’?” or indulge in the pursuit of truth.

If one, agrees, that the body is not the Self, then how can the experience of birth, life, death, rebirth, and reincarnation can be true because the Self is unborn and non-dual.
Only if one proves the formless has a birth, and then only it is possible to accept the birth, death, and reincarnation as part of the reality. Thus, our body-based understanding has to be rectified mentally to grasp the non-dualistic truth.
For a Gnani, nobody is ever born, nobody is ever lived, no one ever dies and nobody is ever reincarnated, because he sees only consciousness is in everything and everywhere in the midst of diversity or duality or waking and he is fully conscious that, no second thing exists other than consciousness.
Diversity has no meaning for a Gnani because he has realized unity in diversity.
Limiting the mind (I) to the physical entity is the cause of all confusion. Therefore, there is a need to know “What is the mind?” “What is the substance of the mind?” and “What is the source of the mind?’ to overcome all the confusion.

Deeper self-search reveals the fact that man and the world exist within the mind, and the mind itself is the universe.:~Santthosh Kumaar

Religion hides God in truth, which is hidden by the illusory form, time, and space.+

Religion hides God in truth, which is hidden by the illusory form, time, and space. Until the form, time and space are present the duality is present. The duality creates the illusory prison to the Soul, the Self.

Religious rites and rigid ceremonies were passed down from one generation to the next as a practice or set customs and traditions and performed automatically with blind faith. Such worship based on the belief of God does not reach God in truth.

The Soul is God in truth. Realize God in truth. The ‘Soul' is prior to anything that exists.

The Soul is the Self. The Soul is present in the form of consciousness. The Soul is self-evident It is not established by extraneous proofs.

It is not possible to deny the Soul because it is the very essence of the one who denies it. The Soul is the basis of all kinds of knowledge, presuppositions, and proofs.

Remember:~

Religion is regarded as sacred and real by the common people, by the wise as false, and by the political class as useful.

Religion blocks one from realizing God in truth because religion is based on myth whereas Spirituality is based on the truth.

God in truth is not based on your inherited blind faith or belief. Religions are based on personal Gods whereas Sage Sankara’s Supreme Brahman (God in truth) is impersonal, Nirguna (without Gunas or attributes), Nirakara (formless), Nirvisesha (without special characteristics), immutable, eternal, and Akarta (non-agent). God is above all needs and desires. God is always the Witnessing Subject. God can never become an object as God is beyond the reach of the senses. God is non-dual, one without a second. God has no other besides it. God is destitute of difference, either external or internal. God cannot be described because description implies a distinction. God cannot be distinguished from any other than God. In God, there is not a distinction between substance and attribute. Sat-Chit-Ananda constituted the very essence or Svarupa of God, and not just God's attributes. The Nirguna Brahman of Sage Sankara is impersonal.

Rig Veda: ~ 'Prajnanam Brahma'- Consciousness is the ultimate reality or Brahman or God in truth.

Do not accept any other God other than the Soul. The Soul is God in truth, Nothing is real but the Soul, which is present in the form of consciousness. Nothing matters but realizing God in truth. God in truth is everywhere and in everything. Let these words be inscribed in your subconscious.

God in truth is hidden by the illusory universe. God in truth alone is real and eternal and all else is an illusion.

Brahman is merely a word to indicate the ultimate truth or God in truth. The ultimate truth itself is God in truth.

The Soul, the Self is unborn, and undifferentiated consciousness is Brahman or God in truth. :~Santthosh Kumaar

In Brahma Sutras Sage Sankara takes for granted, and assumes that a world was created: He there mixes dogmatic theology with philosophy.+

Some people claim that in Sage Sankara's philosophy, there is no place for a personal God (Ishvara), because Ishvara is also described...